What Different Crypto Regulatory Regimes Actually Require
Authorisation is not binary. The requirements that separate a supervised regime from a registration desk.
Providers present authorisation as a yes or no. Regimes differ enough that the jurisdiction matters as much as the licence. It is worth checking this against a MiCA-compliant exchange, whose authorisation and permissions are on a public register you can read yourself.
What a substantive regime requires
Minimum capital scaled to activities. Client asset segregation as a legal obligation with independent assurance. Fit and proper assessment of management and qualifying shareholders. Governance, risk and internal audit functions. Complaint handling with defined timelines. Regular reporting and on-site inspection.
And an authority with the resources to inspect, which separates regimes more than the written rules do.
What a light regime requires
A registration, a fee, a local presence that may be nominal, and a filing obligation with no inspection capacity behind it.
The document looks similar. The supervision does not exist.
How to tell which you are looking at
Is there a searchable public register? Substantive regimes publish one with permitted activities and enforcement history.
Does the authority publish enforcement actions? An authority that has never sanctioned anyone in a sector of any size is not supervising it.
Are permitted activities itemised? Substantive regimes grant custody, exchange and transfer separately. A single undifferentiated licence usually indicates a lighter regime.
Is there a client asset rule with assurance requirements? This is the provision that determines outcomes.
Passporting and why the home authority matters
Authorisation in one member state permits operation across the union by notification.
So a provider supervised by a rigorous authority is supervised by it everywhere, and one authorised in the least demanding member state operates union-wide under that supervision. Funds face the same question with an extra reporting layer, which is what a platform built for institutional allocations is structured around.
Ask which authority, not merely whether authorised in Europe.
The structure to recognise
A group holding genuine authorisation in a substantive jurisdiction while contracting clients to an entity elsewhere.
The protections attach to the authorised entity. If your agreement is with a different one, you have the marketing.
What to verify
Authority, registration number, entity name matching your contract, permitted activities covering what they do for you, conditions and enforcement history.
Five minutes on the authority’s own site, and it is the only part of assessment that cannot be substituted by reading a provider’s material. If you want to see what these terms look like in a working product, Collect & Exchange states them openly.
Filed under: licensing, jurisdictions, supervision